Trial reportHaematologica2026
HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with sickle cell disease: results from the phase II DREP-HAPLO trial.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Haploidentical transplantation in sickle cell disease: toward donor availability for all patients.Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the final analysis of the DREP-HAPLO multicenter phase II protocol, which evaluated haploidentical transplantation after a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen incorporating thiotepa, in children and adults with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). Twenty-two patients (median age, 17 years; range, 12-40) received a conditioning regimen consisting of 2 Gy total body irradiation, thymoglobulin, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and thiotepa, followed by T-cell-replete bone marrow infusion and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis based on post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint, event-free survival, defined as survival without graft failure and without moderate-to-severe chronic GvHD, was 68.18% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 51.25%-90.70%) and 61.98% (95% CI: 44.07%-87.19%) at 1 and 4 years, respectively. Overall survival and rejection-free survival at 4 years were 90.15% (95% CI: 78.03%-100%) and 85.56% (95% CI: 71.63%- 100%), respectively. Six patients (27%) developed moderate-to-severe GVHD. In most cases (4/6) GvHD resolved, leaving only two patients (9%) with persistent moderate-to-severe GvHD at their last follow-up. Eighty-five grade 2 to 4 infectious episodes were reported in 21 patients during the 24 months of follow-up, most of which were bacterial (38 cases). These data strengthen existing evidence supporting the feasibility of haploidentical transplantation in both pediatric and adult patients with severe SCD, demonstrating a very low rejection rate when thiotepa is incorporated into the conditioning regimen. Future efforts should focus on reducing chronic GvHD and infection rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.