Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376561›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2026

Is there a best frontline therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia?

Akriti G Jain, Mark Dalgetty, Jorge E Cortes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akriti G JainTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Mark DalgettyGeorgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Jorge E CortesGeorgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA. jorge.cortes@augusta.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) was transfigured with the introduction of imatinib in 2001. Since then, four other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and most recently asciminib, have garnered approval for frontline management of CML-CP. The second generation TKI (2G-TKI) and asciminib have all been shown to be significantly superior to imatinib in attaining molecular responses, and asciminib possibly superior to 2G-TKI. With limited prospective comparisons between the 2G-TKI and similar survival outcomes with imatinib compared to 2G-TKI, the selection of a TKI for patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP must be individualized to the needs of that specific patient. Important factors to consider when choosing a drug include patient-related factors (age, co-morbidities, lifestyle considerations, quality of life, patient preferences, shared-decision making and whether treatment-free remission is a goal), disease-related factors (risk stratification, transcript type, presence of high-risk gene mutations such as ASXL1) and drug-related factors (major molecular response rates with each TKI, adverse events, rates of treatment discontinuation and treatment-free remission rates).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsHumansTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41376561
PMCPMC13317861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.