ReviewHaematologica2026
Is there a best frontline therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia?
Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Introduction to the Review Series. Chronic myeloid leukemia in 2026.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) was transfigured with the introduction of imatinib in 2001. Since then, four other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and most recently asciminib, have garnered approval for frontline management of CML-CP. The second generation TKI (2G-TKI) and asciminib have all been shown to be significantly superior to imatinib in attaining molecular responses, and asciminib possibly superior to 2G-TKI. With limited prospective comparisons between the 2G-TKI and similar survival outcomes with imatinib compared to 2G-TKI, the selection of a TKI for patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP must be individualized to the needs of that specific patient. Important factors to consider when choosing a drug include patient-related factors (age, co-morbidities, lifestyle considerations, quality of life, patient preferences, shared-decision making and whether treatment-free remission is a goal), disease-related factors (risk stratification, transcript type, presence of high-risk gene mutations such as ASXL1) and drug-related factors (major molecular response rates with each TKI, adverse events, rates of treatment discontinuation and treatment-free remission rates).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.