ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2025
Arm positions with increased risk of subscapularis external impingement at the subcoracoid arch.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA cadaveric biomechanical study was used to analyze arm positions that could lead to increased risk of subscapularis tears due to subcoracoid impingement.
methodsSix cadaveric shoulders (two male and four female; mean age, 68.4±2.3 years) were evaluated for subcoracoid external impingement using a custom shoulder testing system with a pressure-mapping sensor. The contact area and the mean and peak contact pressures between the subcoracoid arch and the subscapularis complex were measured. Eight arm positions were assessed, including 20° and 60° forward flexion (FF) and abduction (ABD) with maximal internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER).
resultsThe overall incidence of subcoracoid impingement was 52.1% across all tests, with no contact observed at 20° ABD in the maximal IR position. Except for 20° ABD with maximal IR, the mean contact area significantly differed across the seven arm positions (P=0.009). However, mean and peak contact pressures did not show significant differences (P=0.188 and P=0.065, respectively). The highest mean contact pressure was recorded at 60° ABD with maximal ER (25.7±17.4 kPa), followed by 20° FF with maximal IR (23.2±12.5 kPa), 60° FF with maximal IR (18.2±8.3 kPa), and 60° ABD with maximal IR (18.3±12.0 kPa). The contact area and peak contact pressure exhibited similar trends to mean contact pressure.
conclusionsThis cadaveric study demonstrated increased subcoracoid arch contact when shoulders were at 20° and 60° FF with IR and at 60° ABD with both ER and IR. These findings suggest potential external subscapularis impingement in these positions, although not all comparisons were statistically significant. Level of evidence: Cadaveric biomechanical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.