ArticleAcute and critical care2025
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular internal jugular vein compression to increase internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in hospitalized patients: a prospective observational study in Japan.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-time ultrasound-guided catheterization of the internal jugular vein (IJV) is widely used for its safety and high success rate. However, it becomes difficult when the IJV's cross-sectional area (CSA) is reduced. A reported technique applies manual pressure (with fingers) to the supraclavicular IJV to impede venous return and enlarge the distal CSA. While effective in previous studies, its clinical utility remains unclear, as those studies involved only healthy volunteers and used blind technique. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our novel ultrasound-guided compression of the proximal IJV.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 25 hospitalized patients were included. Two ultrasound machines were used: one to visualize the CSA of the distal IJV, and the other to apply and guide compression of the supraclavicular IJV, ensuring real-time confirmation of venous occlusion. Patients were asked about pain during the compression procedure. The primary outcome was the degree of dilation at the puncture site of the IJV.
resultsAll 25 patients (mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 5.2±3.6) completed the study. Supraclavicular IJV compression resulted in a significant increase in the CSA of the distal IJV by approximately 150%, from 0.4±0.3 cm² to 1.0±0.3 cm² (P<0.001). No patient reported any pain during the procedure.
conclusionsUltrasound-guided supraclavicular IJV compression significantly increased the CSA of the distal IJV in hospitalized patients. This method enhances vein visibility by increasing IJV volume, potentially improving the success and safety of central venous catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.