ArticleJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2025
Clinical practice guideline for Traditional Chinese Medicine: cervical radiculopathy.
Article in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation on Cervical and Dorsal Muscle Tone in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical radiculopathy (CR) poses a significant challenge due to its debilitating impact on physical function, daily activities, psychological well-being, and social engagement. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has emerged as a valuable approach in managing CR. This study aims to present a comprehensive clinical practice guideline for the management of CR through TCM. Utilizing internationally recognized guideline standards, we meticulously developed this guideline. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was employed to rigorously assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Recommendations were formulated through the nominal group technique. Expert consensus identified nine clinical questions and twenty-three outcome indicators. After careful consideration of evidence quality, balance of benefits and harms, patient preferences, costs, clinical feasibility, accessibility, and clinical acceptability, the guideline working group formulated seventeen recommendations. These recommendations encompass various aspects such as diagnosis, TCM syndrome types, Chinese medicine compounds, Chinese patent medicines, acupuncture, manual therapy, traditional exercise therapy, surgical indications, and preventive measures. The majority of recommendations were weakly suggested or consensus-based, with the exception of acupuncture and manual therapy, which received strong recommendations. This guideline serves as a valuable resource for enhancing clinical decision-making and contributing to the comprehensive management of patients with CR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.