Trial reportJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2025
Efficacy and safety of Shi's cervical manipulation versus diclofenac for patients with acute and subacute neck pain: a multicenter clinical randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo confirm the effectiveness and safety of Shi's manipulation in treating acute and subacute neck pain patients.
methodsThis multicenter, positive controlled, randomized clinical trial has trial and control groups. There were 240 patients randomly assigned to the trial group and the control group, and both groups received their respective intervention treatment methods for a period of 12 weeks. The time windows for clinical data collection were before treatment, immediately after treatment, 3-d 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 -week after treatment, and follow-up was conducted at 26 and 52-week after treatment. The observed indicators used include primary outcome index and secondary outcome index, with the primary outcome index being the assessment of neck pain severity, which is evaluated by patients using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary secondary outcome index include, (a) cervical dysfunction index, measured by patients using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for self-assessment; (b) Cervical activity measurement, measured through the cervical range of motion measurement program on Android mobile system; (c) Satisfaction treatment assessment, determined by the patient's self-evaluation; (d) Safety index, recorded the incidence of adverse reactions and adverse event.
resultsThe results showed that these efficacy indices were improved in different degrees in both groups. At immediate after intervention, there was significant difference in NRS, NDI, Cervical Range of Motion (ROM) between the two groups (
conclusionOur findings suggest that Shi's manipulation can be a good complementary treatment option in patients with acute and subacute neck pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.