Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376181›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

Pulmonary ultrasound provides a more accurate assessment of pulmonary congestion than wet/dry lung weight in rats.

André Timóteo Sapalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

André Timóteo SapaloDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Vascular Biology Laboratory, School of Medicine, São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3357-7757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary congestion is a common complication in critically ill patients, but its quantification remains challenging. The wet-to-dry (W/D) lung weight ratio, widely used in experimental models, is a terminal and semi-quantitative method. Lung ultrasonography (LU) may offer a non-invasive and reproducible alternative for assessing pulmonary edema. To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of LU compared with the W/D ratio in a rat model of oleic acid-induced lung injury. Thirty Wistar-Kyoto rats were randomized into injury (oleic acid, n = 15) and control (saline, n = 15) groups. Echocardiography and LU were performed at baseline and 1 h after infusion. B-line scoring was independently analyzed by two echocardiographers, with reproducibility assessed by Bland-Altman plots. Evans blue dye evaluated vascular permeability. Oleic acid-treated rats showed significantly higher LU scores, B-line counts, W/D ratios, and Evans blue levels than controls. LU demonstrated good diagnostic performance in detecting lung edema in this experimental model, with excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement confirming strong reproducibility. LU proved accurate, reproducible, and non-terminal for detecting pulmonary congestion in rats, showing good agreement with traditional gravimetric measures and supporting its use for longitudinal assessment of pulmonary edema in experimental research.

Indexed as

LungPulmonary EdemaAnimalsMaleOleic AcidOrgan SizeRatsRats, Inbred WKYReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyOleic AcidEvans blue dyepulmonary B‐lines echocardiographypulmonary congestionpulmonary ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41376181
PMCPMC12696010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.