ArticleThe Journal of school health2026
Adoption and Implementation of California State Transgender and Nonbinary Protections in Los Angeles Area High Schools.
Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adoption and Implementation of California State Transgender and Nonbinary Protections in Los Angeles Area High Schools.The Journal of school health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCalifornia is a leader in adopting numerous transgender and nonbinary adolescent (TNBA)-protective education policies. However, the adoption and implementation of these policies remain largely unexamined. This study explored local school adoption and implementation of California state TNBA-protective policies.
methodsNine Los Angeles area high schools enrolled in another study (R01MD016082) participated in this explorative qualitative case study. Case study methods included document collection, campus observations, member checks, and seven student focus group discussions (FGDs; n = 39) between August 2022 and April 2024. Data were analyzed by multiple coders following the Framework Method to compare the implementation of school, district, and state policies.
resultsImplementation of name changes, gender-neutral restrooms, private accommodations, and sexual health education varied between schools and districts. While many schools did not meet state mandates to protect TNBA student access to education, others feasibly implemented these policies, and some adopted innovative approaches to protect TNBA. District oversight, publication of policies and facility access, staff training, funding, and infrastructure were key factors in successful implementation. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Study findings highlight the feasibility of the implementation of TNBA protections in schools, with recommendations to adopt gender transition planning, publish policies for student access, and ensure the availability of gender-neutral restrooms and private accommodations.
conclusionsImplementation of these policies is feasible with sufficient support and oversight. TNBA-protective policies can be strengthened with accountability mechanisms and promotion of implementation strategies, such as technical assistance. Future research should examine the implementation of these policies statewide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.