ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
Outcomes and Acceptability of the Community-Based Occupational Well-Being Intervention Among Health Care Educators-Mixed Method Pilot Study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes and Acceptability of the Community-Based Occupational Well-Being Intervention Among Health Care Educators-Mixed Method Pilot Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesTo evaluate the outcomes and acceptability of the Community-based Participatory Occupational Well-being Intervention for Educators. METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN AND JUSTIFICATION: This pilot study used a sequential explanatory mixed-method intervention study design in which the post-intervention qualitative data were embedded in the quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test data to explain and expand the intervention outcomes and to evaluate intervention acceptability. ETHICAL ISSUES AND APPROVAL: This study received an ethical statement from the UEF Committee on Research Ethics (7/2021 15.4.2021) and followed the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. RESEARCH METHODS AND
interventionThe quantitative pre-and post-test data were collected using an electronic questionnaire among health care educators (intervention n = 19, comparison n = 22). The 1-year intervention included (i) an online course, formation of (ii) an occupational well-being development team, which (iii) planned and (iv) implemented community-specific development actions. Qualitative interview data were collected from participants (n = 9) 3 months post-intervention. The quantitative data were analysed statistically and the qualitative data by deductive-inductive content analysis. The main results were merged into a joint display as mixed-method meta-inferences.
resultsPositive changes were found in occupational well-being, promoting activities and workplace support. Educators experienced improvements in work organisation processes and reflection on occupational well-being issues. The study found no significant change in the overall self-assessed level of occupational well-being. The intervention framework was considered functional, with workload issues as the main barriers. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this study were a small sample size and a long intervention period, which challenged participant engagement and outcome evaluation.
conclusionsThe intervention enables community-level occupational well-being development, and it can be applied in health care educators' work communities. The study suggests refining the intervention in terms of information provision, time resources and community-level orientation and discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.