Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376049›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Effect of an Alternating Magnetic Field-Assisted Freezing Process on the Quality of Frozen Penaeus Japonicus.

Dazhang Yang, Qifei Zhang, Jing Xie, Guoqing Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dazhang YangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-2963
Qifei ZhangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Jing XieCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3194-9273
Guoqing DingCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.

Funding

Shanghai Professional Technology Service Platform on Cold Chain Equipment Performance and Energy Saving Testing Evaluation 20DZ2292200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freezing is a common food preservation method, but conventional freezing often produces large, irregular ice crystals that damage muscle tissue and degrade food quality. This study developed an experimental system using an impact freezer to investigate the effects of alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) of different intensities (0 G, 20 G, 40 G, 60 G, and 80 G) and frequencies (50 Hz, 100 Hz, 150 Hz, 200 Hz, and 250 Hz) on the freezing behavior and muscle quality of Penaeus Japonicus. Results showed that applying a 40 G AMF (AMF-40) significantly reduced freezing time, thawing loss, and cooking loss. It also improved water retention, texture, and color stability. Water distribution analysis indicated that AMF-40 limited the movement and loss of immobilized and free water. Microstructural observations revealed smaller pores and more intact muscle fibers, suggesting the formation of finer ice crystals. Under a 200 Hz AMF (AMF-200 Hz), samples exhibited further decreases in freezing time, thawing loss, and cooking loss, along with significant improvements in hardness, and Springiness, while maintaining muscle color. Enhanced water-holding capacity was also observed, preserving bound water content. Overall, both AMF-40 and AMF-200 Hz promoted the formation of smaller ice crystals and effectively preserved the muscle quality of Penaeus Japonicus during freezing, improving the preservation outcome.

Indexed as

alternating magnetic field-assisted freezingice crystal sizemicrostructurewater-holding capacity

Identifiers

PMID41376049
PMCPMC12692254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.