ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Continuous Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Multiple Pesticide Residues in Pineapple.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pesticide residues are one of the key factors affecting food safety and human health. This study systematically monitored the pesticide residue levels in pineapples from major production regions in China and assessed the dietary exposure risks. A total of 387 samples were collected during the pineapple harvesting seasons from 2023 to 2025. The residues of 88 pesticides were detected using GC, GC-MS, and LC-MS/MS. The results showed that 20 pesticides were detected, with detection rates of cypermethrin, carbendazim, and gibberellic acid exceeding 10%. Based on the Chinese National Standard GB 2763, the compliance rate of the samples was 98.71%. In the worst-case scenario, the ADI % for all population subgroups was less than 1%, the %ARfD was less than 60%, and the Hazard Index was less than 1.5%, far below the 100% risk threshold, indicating that the pesticide residue risk in pineapples is low and at an acceptable level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.