Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375844›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

The Kock Pouch in Modern Practice Revisited: A Literature Review and Clinically Relevant Summary.

Rozan Marjiyeh Awwad, Pär Myrelid, Hayim Gilshtein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rozan Marjiyeh AwwadUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel.ORCID 0009-0009-0363-7190
Pär MyrelidDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-9213
Hayim GilshteinUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients requiring an ileostomy, the selection of the reconstruction method significantly influences long-term functionality and quality of life. Engaging young patients with the reality of a permanent ileostomy for the remainder of their lives is particularly sensitive and naturally encourages the search for alternative options that may be offered in select cases. Although the end ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) continue to be the standard procedures, both possess inherent limitations. When neither approach is feasible, or when these reconstructive techniques have been unsuccessful, having an alternative such as the continent ileostomy (CI) (Kock pouch) proves highly valuable. This review aims to summarize the current indications, contraindications, technical challenges, and outcomes of the Kock pouch to provide surgeons, especially persons with less experience with this procedure, with relevant clinically meaningful information for proper counseling and management of patients.

Indexed as

continent ileostomyIPAA failureKock pouchreviewsurgical education

Identifiers

PMID41375844
PMCPMC12692993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.