ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Non-Invasive Diagnostic Algorithm in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: Is Bone Scintigraphy Always Enough?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technetium-99m bone scintigraphy has revolutionized the non-invasive diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) and markedly increased disease recognition. Although this technique should ideally be applied in patients with a high pre-test probability of ATTR-CM, its use in other clinical settings may reveal incidental pathological myocardial uptake that prompts referral to specialized centers even in the absence of typical red flags. In such cases, where confounding factors such as left ventricular hypertrophy from alternative causes may coexist, awareness of potential pitfalls and the integration of scintigraphic findings with clinical features, biomarkers, and echocardiographic data are essential to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapy. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides a crucial complementary role, offering refined tissue characterization, improved differential diagnosis, and valuable prognostic insights. A combined approach that situates scintigraphy within the broader clinical context and incorporates CMR in ambiguous cases is fundamental to ensure an accurate diagnosis and optimal patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.