ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
First Breath Matters: Out-of-Hospital Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is often a lifesaving intervention in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to optimize gas exchange and prevent secondary brain injury, thereby avoiding the deleterious effects of both hypoxia and hyperoxia, as well as hypocapnia and hypercapnia. However, MV in these patients represents a unique clinical challenge, as it must take into account multiple parameters, including cerebral autoregulation and autoregulatory reserves, brain compliance, cerebral dynamics such as intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and cerebral blood flow (CBF), as well as systemic hemodynamics and respiratory system mechanics. Moreover, the detrimental effects of MV on extracranial organs and systems are well established, with the lungs being the most vulnerable, particularly when non-protective ventilation strategies involving high tidal volumes (TV) and inspiratory pressures are applied. Currently, the optimal ventilation approach in patients with TBI, with or without LI, remains incompletely defined. While protective ventilation practices are recommended for a large number of critically ill patients, their application in individuals with acute brain injury (ABI) may adversely affect cerebral and systemic hemodynamics, as well as brain physiology, potentially leading to secondary damage and poor clinical outcomes. Because the consequences of TBI, such as secondary brain damage and lung complications, begin shortly after the primary event, the role of prehospital MV in these patients is crucial. However, existing data from the out-of-hospital setting are scarce. Thus, in the present review, we aim to summarize the available evidence on MV in patients with TBI, with an emphasis on the prehospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.