Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375699›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

From Awake to Minimalist Spontaneous Ventilation Thoracoscopic Mediastinum Surgery: How Far Are We?

Alexandro Patirelis, Vincenzo Ambrogi, Eugenio Pompeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandro PatirelisUnit of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-7409-8470
Vincenzo AmbrogiUnit of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8947-3175
Eugenio PompeoUnit of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous ventilation (SV) video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is aimed at offering less invasive alternatives to equivalent procedures under tracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation (MV) and its benefits have shown encouraging results in lung surgery. In addition, there is also growing interest in SV-VATS in mediastinum surgery. The rationale of SV in simpler mediastinum procedures is that MV anesthesia could be considered avoidable if SV anesthesia protocols could provide similar or even better results. On the other hand, for other indications involving more delicate patient subgroups, SV-VATS is aimed at offering a more rapid recovery with less anesthesia-related risks of cardio-respiratory complications. Based on encouraging initial results, SV is also being proposed for more demanding surgical procedures, including tracheal resection and esophagectomy. However, SV mediastinum surgery also implies contraindications, potential disadvantages and peculiar physiopathologic issues which must be clearly acknowledged. This perspective is aimed at providing a critical overview of the current knowledge about SV for mediastinum surgery, with a particular emphasis on the last 10 years of data about thymectomy, biopsy of mediastinal masses, thoracic sympathectomy, tracheal resection, pericardial window and esophagectomy.

Indexed as

awake thoracic surgerymediastinum surgerynon-intubated thoracic surgeryspontaneous ventilation thoracic surgeryvideo-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41375699
PMCPMC12693076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.