Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375651›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Advancing Precision Medicine in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Abdul Al-Shawwa, David W Cadotte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdul Al-ShawwaHotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6486-9854
David W CadotteHotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of nontraumatic spinal cord dysfunction and remains clinically heterogeneous in presentation and course. This review synthesizes current evidence on predictors of neurological outcomes across conventional prognostic factors (clinical and macrostructural metrics) and quantitative neuroimaging (microstructural metrics), as well as how machine learning (ML) models integrate these predictors into a precision medicine framework to aid in DCM management. We explore evidence on conventional clinical and radiographic factors. Although several signs and scales are associated with clinical outcomes, cross-study inconsistency and the limits of linear models blunt their standalone utility, underscoring the need for multifactorial modelling. We then assess quantitative MRI biomarkers, including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer, and myelin water imaging, which index axonal integrity and myelination, thereby enriching risk stratification and prediction. Building on these measurements, we examine ML models combining clinical, imaging, and demographic features to predict postoperative outcomes and, increasingly, the natural history of mild DCM. Finally, current gaps and necessary future directions are outlined, including protocol harmonization, prospective multicentre validation, and clinician-patient education to support equitable uptake. Collectively, this review advances in DCM diagnosis and prognosis, highlighting the role of precision medicine tools for personalized patient care.

Indexed as

advanced imagingcervical myelopathyDCMmachine learningpredictive modelprognosticspinal canal stenosisspinal cord compressionspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID41375651
PMCPMC12693022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.