Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375612›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Validity and Reliability of the Six-Minute Walking Test Compared to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Individuals with Heart Failure Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Garyfallia Pepera, Varsamo Antoniou, Eleni Karagianni, Ladislav Batalik, Jing Jing Su

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Domain-specific effects of NADFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Garyfallia PeperaClinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35132 Lamia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-0325
Varsamo AntoniouClinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35132 Lamia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8029-9767
Eleni KaragianniClinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35132 Lamia, Greece.
Ladislav BatalikDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2147-1541
Jing Jing SuSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

Funding

Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, conceptual development of research organization (FNBr, 65269705)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary exercise testingfunctional assessmentheart failurereliabilitysix-minute walk testvalidity

Identifiers

PMID41375612
PMCPMC12693657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.