ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Introducing an Innovative Pain Scale for Assessing Postpartum Pain in Mares: Preliminary Clinical Evaluation.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral Presentation, Clinical Management, and Outcome of Maternal Rejection in Mares: A Retrospective Case Series of 27 Cases.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- How Do Women and Domestic Animals Share Parturition Pain? A Systematic Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain after giving birth is commonly observed in horses, yet there has not been a specific tool developed for assessing this pain in postpartum mares. The goal was to adapt existing equine pain scales and to preliminarily validate a practical pain scale for use by veterinarians and caregivers after foaling.
methodsThe pain scale was developed by adapting items from other pain scales, including established orthopedic and colic equine pain scales, and incorporating caregiver feedback. The final scale includes eight areas for assessing pain: behavior, facial expressions, vital signs, udder examination, gastrointestinal function, hoof temperature, response to food, and movement. Observations were conducted on ten heavy draft mares that experienced dystocia, with pain scores recorded twice daily for 1 to 4 days postpartum. Simultaneous saliva samples were collected to measure cortisol levels.
resultsThe pain scale proved feasible for use at the stall and allowed for partial scoring when certain assessments were deemed risky. Pain scores were highest on the first day after foaling and decreased as the mares recovered. In a case of clinical deterioration, a substantial increase in pain score was noted. Increased pain scores were associated with elevated cortisol levels, supporting the biological relevance of the scale. In clinical practice, if a pain score exceeded 40% of the maximum score, the mare was identified as a patient requiring analgesic treatment.
conclusionsThis postpartum-specific pain scale provides a standardized method for assessing pain in mares after foaling and may assist in guiding appropriate pain management. Although the proposed pain scale shows promise as a clinical tool, the present results are preliminary and require confirmation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.