Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375468›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Perceptions of Elephants' Labor and Autonomy in Zoos.

Angela M Lacinak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Angela M LacinakSocial and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6008-0335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many modern zoos maintain charismatic megafauna, such as elephants, as their iconic residents, as these animals have been shown to hold the zoogoers' gaze more adeptly than demurer animals. This study sought to determine zoo supporters' perceptions of elephants' emotions and welfare under conditions in which elephants receive rewards and demonstrate behaviors within elephant-caregiver interactions in a zoo to generate key themes associated with those perceptions and to compare those perceptions to zoo professionals' through the lens of The Five Domains animal welfare assessment model. This qualitative study employed multiple methodological strategies, including surveys, autoethnography, interviews, and welfare assessments. The article explores two themes that were generated regarding participants' perceptions: elephants' autonomy and participation in labor. The discourse of elephant labor in a zoo is timely, as animal labor among domestic animals is a growing topic in social sciences research. Elephants' welfare was perceived as largely positive, though there was a small number of participants who felt the elephants did not enjoy their labor. Participants' perceptions were mostly aligned with zoo professionals' perceptions. As this is the first article to discuss zoo animal labor, it makes a unique contribution to the current literature and may have applications to other species' labor within zoos.

Indexed as

animal emotionsanimal laboranimal welfareanthrozoologyautonomyelephantsvisitorszoos

Identifiers

PMID41375468
PMCPMC12691431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.