Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41375463›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Farm Animal Welfare: Consumers' Perception Toward Different Breeds of Animals in Italy.

Mariavittoria Perrone, Chiara Mazzocchi, Nicola Palladini, Luciana Bava, Giordano Ruggeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Palmitoylethanolamide in Human and Animal Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariavittoria PerroneDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Production, Territory, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-6920-9124
Chiara MazzocchiDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Production, Territory, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-8841
Nicola PalladiniDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Production, Territory, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-1766-488X
Luciana BavaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Production, Territory, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6521-3195
Giordano RuggeriDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Production, Territory, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-6333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farm animal welfare has become a key focus in contemporary discussions on ethical food production and sustainable agriculture. Public discourse and evolving consumer attitudes reflect a growing and increasingly sophisticated awareness of animal welfare issues. This study investigates how Italian consumers evaluate the welfare of different farm animals and how such evaluations are influenced by socio-demographic factors, personal attitudes, and the level of knowledge in livestock production systems. Using survey data from 391 respondents and applying regression analysis, the study highlights significant variation in perceived welfare across species. In general, attitudinal variables are the most consistent and significant predictors of perceived animal welfare across all animal categories. Moreover, respondents with professional experience in livestock production tend to view the welfare of cattle and swine more favorably. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders aiming to align animal welfare standards with public expectations and to promote more informed, ethical consumer choices.

Indexed as

animal welfare economicsanimal well-beingconsumers’ interestconsumers’ perceptionfarm animal welfareperception of animal welfare

Identifiers

PMID41375463
PMCPMC12691389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.