Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Václav BrantFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Andrea RychláOSEVA PRO Ltd., Purkyňova 10, 764 01 Opava, Czech Republic.
Kateřina HamouzováFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6902-6087
Viktor VrbovskýOSEVA PRO Ltd., Purkyňova 10, 764 01 Opava, Czech Republic.
Pavel ProcházkaFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-4187
Josef CháraFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Jiří HolejšovskýFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Theresa PiskáčkováFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2659-069X
Soham BhattacharyaFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-4751
Jiří DrekslerFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0007-9556-3488
Funding
Národní Agentura pro Zemědělský Výzkum QK21010308
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Catch crops play a vital role in agricultural systems by contributing to biomass production, nutrient retention, and carbon sequestration. Among these, species from the
Indexed as
aboveground biomass productioncarbon fixationleaf–stem rationon-traditional Brassicaceaeroot-to-shoot ratiosowing date optimization
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Effect of Sowing Date on the Biomass Production of Non-Traditional and Commonly Used Intercrops from the · full record | OpenQuestion