Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Tong ZouState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protecttion, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Yujie LiCollege of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Yanling WuCollege of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Qingwen YangState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protecttion, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Shuangcheng WangHydrogeological Environmental Survey Center of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Geological Bureau, Urumqi 830011, China.
Zhenfu HuangHydrogeological Environmental Survey Center of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Geological Bureau, Urumqi 830011, China.
Qiang LiHydrogeological Environmental Survey Center of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Geological Bureau, Urumqi 830011, China.
Xiaohui ZhouCollege of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7325-7508
Tianliang ZhengCollege of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Xiangjun PeiState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protecttion, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Jingji LiState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protecttion, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0611-1364
Funding
Key Research and Development Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2023B03011-3Ministry-Provincial Cooperation Project of Natural Resources 2024ZRBSHZ094State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project SKLGP2025Z001Xinjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Project XGMB202356
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Herbaceous plant species form the plant synusia of desert ecosystems and play crucial roles in wind-breaking, sand-fixing, and the maintenance of oasis ecosystem stability. This study focused on the leguminous species
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Functional Traits of Herbaceous Plants with Ecological Restoration Potential Under Drought Conditions. · full record | OpenQuestion