ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Procedural Challenges in Soil Sample Preparation for Pharmaceuticals Analysis.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficiency Assessment of Fenton-Based Pre-Treatment of Medical Wastewater Using Fe, Cu, and Mn Catalysts-Impact on the Aquatic Environment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The determination of trace levels of pharmaceuticals in complex environmental samples requires an appropriate sample preparation stage prior to final determination. Currently, special attention should be paid to pharmaceuticals extensively used on industrial farms due to their possible emission into the soil environment, which has become a public health concern. The greatest challenge in such sample analyses lies in selecting the appropriate analyte extraction procedure. To address these challenges, five sample preparation procedures were evaluated for the determination of 24 pharmaceuticals, aiming to compare analyte recovery. We focused on commonly used stages of the procedure, such as ultrasonication and filtration, to minimize potential analyte loss. Our results indicate that some compounds can be eliminated even up to 100% (including amoxicillin, ampicillin, and lincomycin) during ultrasonication and/or filtration. The selected procedure allowed for the improvement of the recovery value in the case of 15 pharmaceuticals in comparison with the primary method. Consequently, the proposed procedure was applied to analyze environmental soil samples from the area surrounding a poultry farm. This study demonstrates that even problematic compounds, despite their low recovery, can be analyzed by the addition of isotopically labelled internal standards with acceptable accuracy. This finding is particularly important for environmental monitoring, where trace-level detection of pharmaceutical residues is often challenged by matrix complexity and analyte instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.