ReviewCancers2025
Rationale and Emerging Evidence on the Potential Role of HoLEP-Mediated Relief of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in NMIBC Outcomes Through Optimal Management of Chronic Urinary Retention.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative anesthetic management characteristics associated with early postoperative voiding recovery and short-term urinary outcomes after HoLEP in elderly frail patients: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents approximately 70-75% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers and is characterized by high recurrence rates despite guideline-based management. Chronic urinary retention and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) have been proposed as under-recognized modifiers of NMIBC outcomes through prolonged exposure to urinary carcinogens, inflammation, and altered intravesical pharmacokinetics. This narrative review qualitatively synthesizes biological and clinical evidence linking BOO-related dysfunction with NMIBC behavior and explores the emerging, but preliminary, role of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) as a functional adjunct in selected patients.
methodsA narrative review was conducted according to SANRA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched (January 2000-October 2025) using predefined terms for NMIBC, BOO, urinary retention, and HoLEP. Two reviewers independently screened records, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Sixty-one studies met inclusion criteria.
resultsElevated postvoid residual (PVR) (>80-100 mL) and moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were consistently associated with higher NMIBC recurrence rates, independent of tumor stage and grade, in heterogeneous cohorts. Retention correlated with reduced efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin C, likely via uneven drug distribution and a chronically inflamed urothelium. Mechanistic data support a plausible link between BOO-related inflammation, barrier dysfunction, and tumor biology, although direct biomarker correlations with PVR or pharmacokinetic studies are lacking. HoLEP provides durable relief of BOO, reduces PVR, and improves LUTS. Limited retrospective data suggest an association between HoLEP and lower recurrence, but these observations are confounded and should be viewed as hypothesis-generating.
conclusionsChronic urinary retention and BOO appear to be modifiable functional factors that may influence NMIBC recurrence and intravesical therapy performance. HoLEP is a promising option to optimize bladder emptying in carefully selected patients, but its oncologic impact remains unproven and should be considered hypothesis-generating pending prospective, risk-adjusted studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.