ReviewCancers2025
Brain Tumors in Pregnancy: A Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Management, and Ethical Dilemmas.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awake craniotomy with functional mapping for recurrent high-grade IDH-mutant glioma during pregnancy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Case Report: Postpartum diagnosis and microsurgical management of a cervicothoracic intramedullary spinal ependymoma clinically manifesting during the third trimester of pregnancy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) tumors during pregnancy are rare but present significant diagnostic, therapeutic, and ethical challenges. These include both primary and metastatic lesions, which share overlapping clinical features and management complexities. Their clinical course is influenced by gestational physiological changes, which can mask symptoms and delay diagnosis, thereby increasing maternal and fetal risks.
objectiveThis review aims to synthesize current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, treatment options, prognosis, and ethical considerations related to CNS tumors in pregnant patients.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted, including retrospective and prospective studies, clinical guidelines, and systematic reviews focusing on brain and spinal tumors diagnosed during pregnancy. Particular attention was given to the impact of gestational age, tumor histology, and maternal condition on treatment outcomes.
resultsHormone-sensitive tumors such as meningiomas and prolactinomas may exhibit accelerated growth during pregnancy due to elevated progesterone and prolactin levels. Diagnosis is often delayed due to symptom overlap with normal gestational changes. MRI without contrast remains the imaging modality of choice. Glucocorticoids and selected chemotherapy agents can be cautiously used depending on gestational age. Surgical resection, particularly in the second trimester, has been shown to be safe and effective in appropriate clinical scenarios. Multidisciplinary coordination is essential. Prognosis varies based on tumor type and timing of intervention, with maternal survival prioritized in high-risk situations. Ethical management hinges on patient autonomy, informed consent, and proportionality of medical interventions.
conclusionsCNS tumors during pregnancy require early recognition, individualized treatment planning, and ethical vigilance. Multidisciplinary collaboration is vital to optimizing outcomes for both mother and fetus. Future efforts should focus on developing standardized protocols and expanding evidence through multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.