ReviewCancers2025
Challenges and Progress for Treatment of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in the Context of Recent Successes for Sarcoma Therapy.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are one of the most difficult sarcomas to treat. Due to the rarity of MPNSTs, many of the therapeutic approaches used are from treatment guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma. Besides surgery, little success has been achieved using these therapies. Traditional chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens designed to treat sarcoma have unclear efficacy when used to treat MPNSTs. Targeted therapeutics that succeeded in other sarcomas failed to produce positive results in MPNSTs. Moreover, investigational agents that have shown efficacy in preclinical models have produced disappointing outcomes in clinical trials. While therapeutic options for patients with MPNST have remained relatively stagnant, dramatic improvements in therapeutic outcomes of other rare sarcomas have been made. This difference in success is likely caused by the complex heterogeneity of MPNSTs that hinders drug development, although many MPNSTs are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a genetic disorder resulting from mutations in the NF1 gene that encodes the negative RAS regulator neurofibromin. The development of new agents for MPNST treatment has shifted away from solely targeting RAS pathway gene products to stimulating the immune system and manipulating other MPNST driver mutations such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.