ReviewCancers2025
Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Glioblastoma Radiotherapy Planning and Treatment.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating ex vivo platforms with AI to guide glioblastoma treatment.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Validation of open-source deep learning segmentation tools for automated glioma volumetry: a narrative review of Dice scores, workflow efficiency, and clinical RANO 2.0 implementation.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is an aggressive central nervous system tumor characterized by diffuse infiltration. Despite substantial advances in oncology, survival outcomes have shown little improvement over the past three decades. Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment; however, it faces several challenges, including considerable inter-observer variability in clinical target volume delineation, dose constraints associated with adjacent organs at risk, and the persistently poor prognosis of affected patients. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, have shown promise in automating radiation therapy mapping to improve consistency, accuracy, and efficiency. This narrative review explores current auto segmentation frameworks, dose mapping, and biologically informed radiotherapy planning guided by multimodal imaging and mathematical modeling. Studies have demonstrated reproducible tumor segmentations with DSCs exceeding 0.90, reduced planning within minutes, and emerging predictive capabilities for treatment response. Radiogenomic integration has enabled imaging-based classification of critical biomarkers with high accuracy, reinforcing the potential of deep learning models in personalized radiotherapy. Despite these innovations, deployment into clinical practice remains limited, primarily due to insufficient external validation and single-institution training datasets. This review emphasizes the importance of large, annotated imaging datasets, multi-institutional collaboration, and biologically explainable modeling to successfully translate deep learning into glioblastoma radiation planning and longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.