ArticlePolymers2025
Development and Characterization of Laminated Composites from Açaí Residues and Castor Oil-Based Polyurethane Matrix.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents the development and characterization of laminated composite panels produced from açaí residues and fibers, incorporated into a castor oil-based vegetable polyurethane matrix. The study aimed to evaluate the potential of these Amazonian agro-industrial residues as lignocellulosic reinforcement in sustainable materials. The manufacturing process was carried out by manual lamination and cold pressing, following the recommendations of ABNT NBR 14810-2:2018. The physical (moisture, density, and swelling) and mechanical (perpendicular tensile and static flexural) properties of the resulting panels were analyzed. The results revealed an average moisture content of 6.23% and a 24 h swelling of 2.76%, which are values within and well below the regulatory limits, respectively. The perpendicular tensile strength (0.49 N/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.