ArticlePolymers2025
Geopolymerization of Kaolin Clay with Hemp Fibers for Sustainable Soil Stabilization.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clay and Microsilica Additives' Effect on the Properties and Structure of Injectable Cement-Clay Mortars for Soil Consolidation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of carbonation methods on mechanical behavior and carbonation mechanisms of coal gangue based geopolymer stabilized saline soil.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the aim was to improve the mechanical and durability properties of kaolin clay (KC)-based soil by stabilizing it with geopolymer and natural fiber. In the production of the geopolymer, rice husk ash (RHA) was used as a binder, sodium metasilicate (SMS) as an activator, and another hemp fiber (HF)was used for soil stabilization. Within the scope of the presented study, RHA and SMS were used at three different rates (5%, 7.5%, and 10%), while HF was used in six different volumes (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, and 3%) and two different lengths (6 and 12 mm). The study also examined how much water was in the combinations, which was measured at the optimum level and at -5, +5, and +10 compared to the optimum level. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) was used to check the mechanical qualities of the test specimens and 5- and 10-cycle freeze-thaw (F-T) tests to check the durability properties. The test results indicated that the mixed formulation with 5% RHA, 10% SMS, 2.5% HF, and the optimum water content resulted in the best results for both the UCS and F-T tests. The SEM investigation for this mix found that the microstructural properties for the specimen were directly related to the dense gel phases and the strong fiber-matrix bonding. According to the carbon emissions (CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.