ArticlePolymers2025
Properties of FRC with Carbon Fibres from Recycled Wind Turbine Blades.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the use of recycled carbon fibre (rCF) from wind turbine blades in fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC). The research demonstrates the combined effects of fibre length (25 mm, 35 mm, and 45 mm) and fibre content (0.29%, 0.58%, and 0.87% by volume). The experimental programme included the investigation of compressive and tensile splitting strengths, as well as the determination of the Brittleness Index and fracture energy. The transfer of tensile forces through fibres was assessed based on the surface area of split samples. Tensile strength was determined for two loading directions: parallel and perpendicular to the direction of concreting. It was found that the maximum fibre addition reduced the compressive strength by up to 9% and that the tensile strength was significantly dependent on the fibre orientation, which was determined by the direction of concreting. The tensile strength perpendicular to the direction of concreting increased by a maximum of 11.8% and parallel to the direction of concreting by a maximum of 66% compared to plain concrete, depending on the fibre content and length. The research also demonstrated the synergy of pull-out and rupture of fibres in transmitting tensile forces. These studies provide important insights into the applicability of rCF as a dispersed reinforcement in concrete and have important implications for sustainability in the construction sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.