ArticlePolymers2025
An Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties and ANN-Based Prediction of a Tensile Constitutive Model of ECCs.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixture-of-Experts Learning for Mixture-Response Interpretation and Screening of PE-ECC.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid Local Fibers for Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional concrete materials have limitations in terms of load-bearing capacity and ductile failure. In contrast, Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECCs), with their superior strain-hardening behavior and multiple cracking characteristics, have attracted widespread attention in the field of high-performance materials. In this study, ECC specimens incorporating different types of fibers (polyethylene (PE) fibers, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers) at varying contents were tested to systematically analyze their influence on mechanical properties. Compressive, flexural, and uniaxial tensile strength tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical performance of ECCs. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to examine the fracture surfaces of the fibers, providing deeper insights into the interfacial behavior and fracture morphology of the different fiber-reinforced systems. Fracture surface analysis reveals that the interfacial bonding characteristics between different fibers and the matrix significantly influence fracture behavior. Moreover, as the tensile performance of ECCs is influenced by the interaction of multiple factors, traditional constitutive models exhibit limitations in accurately predicting its complex nonlinear behavior. To address this limitation, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach was adopted to develop a predictive model based on bilinear stress-strain relationships. The model was constructed using ten key input parameters, including matrix composition and fiber properties, and was able to accurately predict the first cracking strain, first cracking stress, ultimate strain, and ultimate stress of ECCs. Sensitivity analysis revealed that fiber tensile strength and fiber content were the most significant factors influencing the tensile behavior. The predicted tensile curves showed strong consistency with the experimental results, thereby confirming the reliability and applicability of the proposed ANN-based model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.