ArticlePolymers2025
Study on the Tensile Properties and Waterproofing Mechanism of Bamboo Fibers Treated by Different Methods.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bamboo fibers have received significant attention due to their biodegradability and environmental benefits. However, their inherent hydrophilicity causes dramatic degradation in mechanical properties after water absorption. Some methods have been adopted to treat bamboo fiber to address this challenge, e.g., sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution treatment, vegetable oil treatment, and carboxylated styrene butadiene rubber (XSBR) treatment. In this study, the sodium silicate solution treatment method is proposed. The effects of four treatment methods on bamboo fibers are systematically evaluated using direct tensile tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results indicate that all four treatment methods can effectively mitigate the reduction in tensile stress and Young's modulus of bamboo fibers after water immersion. Sodium silicate solution (modulus = 3.3)-treated bamboo fibers show the smallest reduction in tensile strength (36.8%), while the Young's modulus of the sodium silicate solution (modulus = 2.3)-treated fibers increased by 4.5%. FTIR analysis shows that four treatment methods lead to reduction in hydrophilic groups in bamboo fiber. For the sodium silicate solution treatment method, a hydrophobic solidified sodium silicate layer forms on the surface of bamboo fibers, which further hinders moisture absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.