ArticlePolymers2025
A Dual Valorization Strategy of Barley Straw for the Development of High-Performance Bio-Based Polyurethane Foams.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a complete and zero-waste valorization strategy for barley straw through the synthesis of bio-polyols and the concurrent utilization of its cellulose fraction as lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers (LCNF) for the development of bio-based polyurethane (PU) foams. Two types of bio-polyols were prepared: one derived from lignin isolated via biomass fractionation, named lignin bio-polyol (LBP), and another obtained directly from unfractionated barley straw, called straw bio-polyol (SBP), thereby incorporating all lignocellulosic constituents into a single reactive matrix. LCNF, produced from the same feedstock, was incorporated at different loadings to achieve full biomass utilization and reinforce the polyurethane foam structure. Foams prepared with LBP exhibited lower density and a more homogeneous structure, whereas those synthesized with SBP developed a stiffer, more crosslinked network. The incorporation of LCNF generally increased apparent density and mechanical performance, with optimal reinforcement at 3 wt.% in foams with SBP and 5 wt.% in LBP foams, corresponding to a 62.5 and 121% enhancement in compressive strength relative to their respective control foams. Moreover, the use of barley straw bio-polyol shifted some thermal degradation peaks toward higher temperatures, evidencing improved thermal resistance. Overall, this dual-route strategy provides a sustainable and versatile methodology for the comprehensive valorization of lignocellulosic biomass, enabling a systematic understanding of the role of each structural component in polyurethane foam synthesis. The resulting materials offer a renewable, low-impact pathway toward high-performance polymeric materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.