ArticlePolymers2025
Proof of Concept for a Novel Ultralight Pneumatic Telescopic Boom Fabricated via Additive Manufacturing for Space Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the performance characteristics of a six-segment telescopic boom prototype, two meters in length, entirely fabricated through additive manufacturing using composite materials, with the aim of optimizing the system's strength-to-weight ratio. To meet the requirements for lightweight and high-stiffness space structures, the study focuses on validating the concept from these perspectives. The current assembly prototype weighs 2154 g for a deployed length of 2 m and a stowed length of 428 mm. The pneumatic extension system demonstrated an average pressure response ranging from 0.40 bar to 1.36 bar under a payload of up to 7370 g. At this threshold, an average inclination of 5.96° and an average deployment time of 60 s were recorded. Under an increased payload of 11,345 g, the prototype exhibited an average inclination of 1.1° and an average deployment time of 30 s, with only three segments fully deployed. This limitation is attributed to the maximum allowable internal pressure of the pneumatic tube, approximately 2.2 bar, where the high frictional and binding forces between the segments exceeded the available pneumatic energy, prematurely interrupting the extension cycle. These findings confirm the applicability of additive manufacturing to complex deployable systems and establish the mechanical and pneumatic performance limits of this prototype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.