Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41374797›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Fluoride-Free MXene-Polymer Composites for Li-Metal and Li-S Batteries: Comparative Synthesis Methods, Integration Rules, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Truong Le Khang, Joonho Bae

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Recent advances in TiNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  4. Recent advances in TiNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Truong Le KhangDepartment of Physics and Semiconductor Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-9191-6343
Joonho BaeDepartment of Physics and Semiconductor Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C 1008272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MXene-polymer hybrids combine the high in-plane conductivity and rich surface chemistry of MXenes with the processability and mechanical tunability of polymers for lithium-metal and lithium-sulfur batteries. Most reported systems still rely on HF-etched MXenes, introducing F-rich terminations, safety and waste issues, and poorly controlled surfaces. This review instead centers on fluoride-free synthesis routes, benchmarks them against HF methods, and translates route-termination relationships into practical rules for choosing polymer backbones. We track the evolution from early linear hosts such as PEO- and PVDF-type polymers to polar nitrile or carbonyl matrices, crosslinked and ionogel networks, and emerging biopolymers and COF-type porous frameworks that are co-designed with MXene terminations to regulate ion transport, interfacial chemistry, and mechanical robustness. These chemistry-backbone pairings are linked to five scalable fabrication modes, including solution blending and film casting, in situ polymerization, surface grafting, layer-by-layer assembly, and electrospinning, and to roles as solid or quasi-solid electrolytes, artificial interphases, separator-like coatings, and electrode-facing architectures. Finally, we highlight key evidence gaps and reporting standards needed to de-risk scale-up of green MXene-polymer batteries.

Indexed as

fluoride-free MXenelithium metal batterieslithium–sulfur batteriesMXene–polymer composites

Identifiers

PMID41374797
PMCPMC12694049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.