ReviewPolymers2025
Materials for Yeast Immobilization in Alcoholic Fermentation: Bridging Conventional Techniques and 3D Bioprinting.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immobilization of yeast cells represents a significant advance in alcoholic fermentation. Compared to traditional methods that rely on the use of free cells, immobilized systems enable higher cell density, easier separation and reuse of biocatalysts, and improved fermentation control, all while maintaining cellular activity. The choice of immobilization material plays a key role in performance. Natural polymers such as alginate provide biocompatibility, but the main drawback is their insufficient mechanical strength. On the other hand, synthetic polymers offer greater durability but raise concerns regarding food safety and cost. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is emerging as a promising solution, enabling the design of structural, customizable matrices with precise cell positioning and tunable physical properties. Traditional materials are undergoing reengineering as bioinks, while new synthetic and hybrid materials are being developed to overcome the limitations of conventional carriers. These innovations combine biocompatibility with mechanical stability and functional adaptability for industrial use. Although the application of 3D bioprinting to produce such carriers has shown promising progress, challenges remain in scalability, process integration, and long-term stability under industrial fermentation conditions. For these reasons, continued interdisciplinary research is necessary to further develop advanced techniques for immobilizing yeast cells for use in alcoholic fermentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.