ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Coverage-Conflict-Aware RFID Reader Placement with Range Adjustment for Complete Tag Coverage in IIoT.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Study on the Localization Technology for Giant Salamanders Using Passive UHF RFID and Incomplete D-Tr Measurement Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is a core enabler of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), yet dense deployments suffer from tag collisions and reader interference that degrade reliability and inflate infrastructure cost. This study proposes a deterministic Reader Deployment Algorithm with Adjustable Reader range (RDA2R) to achieve full tag coverage with minimal interference and reader usage. The method divides the monitored field into grid units, evaluates tag coverage weights, activates high-weight readers with interference checks, and adaptively adjusts interrogation ranges. Simulation results under random and congregation tag distributions show that RDA2R requires about 46-47% fewer readers than ARLDL and 32-33% fewer than MR2D, while improving average tag coverage per reader by over 30%. These results demonstrate that RDA2R provides a scalable, interference-aware, and cost-efficient deployment strategy for RFID-enabled IIoT environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.