ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Conformal Swallowing Accelerometry: Reimagining the Acquisition and Characterization of Swallowing Mechano-Acoustic Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Non-invasive instrumental measurement of swallowing acoustic signals has rested upon the assumptions of signal symmetry and reproducibility along the cervical region and has hence taken the form of single-point acquisition on optimal sites. This study aimed to (i) revisit such assumptions by adopting a conformal array of accelerometers, and hence (ii) lay the foundation for the future design of swallowing accelerometry. (2) Methods: Thirteen young healthy individuals, including eight females (mean age ± SD = 24.38 ± 0.92) and five males (mean age ± SD = 24 ± 3.74), were recruited. Swallowing mechano-acoustic signals of repeated swallowing trials were captured using conformal swallowing accelerometry. The peak intensities and frequencies as well as their respective peak times were extracted from six symmetrical and vertically aligned sites. (3) Results: Three-way ANOVAs with repeated measures suggested differences across trials and channels for both peak intensity and frequency. The additional interaction of bolus volume and repeated trials with a small effect size was also indicated in peak frequency. Intra-personal variability was indicated by coefficients of variance of the peak intensity and frequency of higher than 20%, with values varying within the 95% limits of agreement of at least 10 m/s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.