ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards In-Vehicle Non-Contact Estimation of EDA-Based Arousal with LiDAR.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driver monitoring systems are increasingly relying on physiological signals to assess cognitive and emotional states for improved safety and user experience. Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a particularly informative biomarker of arousal but is conventionally measured with skin-contact electrodes, limiting its applicability in vehicles. This work explores the feasibility of non-contact EDA estimation using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) as a novel sensing modality. In a controlled laboratory setup, LiDAR reflection intensity from the forehead was recorded simultaneously with conventional finger-based EDA. Both classification and regression tasks were performed as follows: feature-based machine learning models (e.g., Random Forest and Extra Trees) and sequence-based deep learning models (e.g., CNN, LSTM, and TCN) were evaluated. Results demonstrate that LiDAR signals capture arousal-related changes, with the best regression model (Temporal Convolutional Network) achieving a mean absolute error of 14.6 on the normalized arousal factor scale (-50 to +50) and a correlation of r = 0.85 with ground-truth EDA. While random split validations yielded high accuracy, performance under leave-one-subject-out evaluation highlighted challenges in cross-subject generalization. The algorithms themselves were not the primary research focus but served to establish feasibility of the approach. These findings provide the first proof-of-concept that LiDAR can remotely estimate EDA-based arousal without direct skin contact, addressing a central limitation of current driver monitoring systems. Future research should focus on larger datasets, multimodal integration, and real-world driving validation to advance LiDAR towards practical in-vehicle deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.