Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41374769›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Enhancements and On-Site Experimental Study on Fall Detection Algorithm for Students in Campus Staircase.

Ying Lu, Yuze Cui, Liang Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying LuCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China.
Yuze CuiCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China.
Liang YanHubei Chemical Safety Association, Wuhan 430060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campus stairwells, characterized by their crowded nature during certain short periods of time, present a high risk for falls that can lead to dangerous stampedes. Accurate fall detection is crucial for preventing such accidents. However, existing research lacks a detection model that balances high precision with lightweight design and lacks on-site experimental validation to assess practical feasibility. This study addresses these gaps by proposing an enhanced fall recognition model based on YOLOv7, validated through on-site experiments. A dataset on campus stairwell falls was established, capturing diverse stairwell personnel behaviors. Four YOLOv7 improvement schemes were proposed, and numerical comparison experiments identified the best-performing model, combining DO-DConv and Slim-Neck modules. This model achieved an average precision (mAP) of 88.1%, 2.41% higher than the traditional YOLOv7, while reducing GFLOPs from 105.2 to 38.2 and cutting training time by 4 h. A field experiment conducted with 22 groups of participants under small-scale populations and varying lighting conditions preliminarily confirmed that the model's accuracy is within an acceptable range. The experimental results also analyzed the changes in detection confidence across different population sizes and lighting conditions, offering valuable insights for further model improvement and its practical applications.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAlgorithmsStair ClimbingStudentsAdultDetection AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleUniversitiesYoung Adultcampus safetyfall detection experimentimproved YOLOv7 algorithmstampede preventionstepping on the stairwell

Identifiers

PMID41374769
PMCPMC12694672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.