Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41374759›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Sensor-Based Cyber Risk Management in Railway Infrastructure Under the NIS2 Directive.

Rafał Wachnik, Katarzyna Chruzik, Bolesław Pochopień

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafał WachnikDepartment of Transport and Computer Science, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1288-6622
Katarzyna ChruzikDepartment of Transport and Computer Science, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6936-8706
Bolesław PochopieńDepartment of Transport and Computer Science, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2093-556X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a sensor-centric cybersecurity framework for railway infrastructure that extends Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) from traditional reliability evaluation into the domain of cyber-induced failures affecting data integrity, availability and authenticity. The contribution lies in bridging regulatory obligations of the NIS2 Directive with field-layer monitoring by enabling risk indicators to evolve dynamically rather than remain static documentation artefacts. The approach is demonstrated using a scenario-based dataset collected from approximately 250 trackside, rolling-stock, environmental and power-monitoring sensors deployed over a 25 km operational segment, with representative anomalies generated through controlled spoofing, replay and injection conditions. Risk was evaluated using RPN scores derived from Severity-Occurrence-Detectability scales, while anomaly-detection performance was observed through detection-latency variation, changes in RPN distribution, and qualitative responsiveness of timestamp-based alerts. Instead of presenting a fixed benchmark, the results show how evidence from real sensor streams can recalibrate O and D factors in near-real-time and reduce undetected exposure windows, enabling measurable compliance documentation aligned with NIS2 Article 21. The findings confirm that coupling FMEA with streaming telemetry creates a verifiable risk-evaluation loop and supports a transition toward continuous, evidence-driven cybersecurity governance in railway systems.

Indexed as

anomaly detectioncritical infrastructureFMEAIoTmachine learningNIS2 Directiverailway cybersecurityrisk managementsensor networks

Identifiers

PMID41374759
PMCPMC12694181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.