ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
EFDepth: A Monocular Depth Estimation Model for Multi-Scale Feature Optimization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MonoPrior-Fusion: Monocular-Prior-Guided Multi-Frame Depth Estimation with Multi-Scale Geometric Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the accuracy issues in monocular depth estimation caused by insufficient feature extraction and inadequate context modeling, a multi-scale feature optimization model named EFDepth was proposed to improve prediction performance. This framework adopted an encoder-decoder structure: the encoder (EC-Net) was composed of MobileNetV3-E and ETFBlock, and its features were optimized through multi-scale dilated convolution; the decoder (LapFA-Net) combined the Laplacian pyramid and the FMA module to enhance cross-scale feature fusion and output accurate depth maps. Comparative experiments between EFDepth and algorithms including Lite-mono, Hr-depth, and Lapdepth were conducted on the KITTI datasets. The results show that, for the three error metrics-RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), AbsRel (Absolute Relative Error), and SqRel (Squared Relative Error)-EFDepth is 1.623, 0.030, and 0.445 lower than the average values of the comparison algorithms, respectively, and for the three accuracy metrics, it is 0.052, 0.023, and 0.011 higher than the average values of the comparison algorithms, respectively. Experimental results indicate that EFDepth outperforms the comparison methods in most metrics, providing an effective reference for monocular depth estimation and 3D reconstruction of complex scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.