ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparison of Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing and Digital Image Correlation Measurement Techniques for Evaluation of Flexural Behavior of CFRP-Prestressed Concrete Beams.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper presents two innovative measurement methods for assessing the flexural performance of precast concrete beams that are prestressed with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) bars. Strains, displacements, crack development, and failure modes were recorded until failure occurred, using a combination of Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing (DFOS) and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) techniques. This approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of the behavior of CFRP-prestressed beams under load, allowing for more accurate predictions than traditional measurement systems. By integrating both techniques, it is possible to validate results and establish an effective monitoring system. Based on tests conducted on three CFRP-prestressed beams subjected to three-point bending, general recommendations are made for both DFOS and DIC measurement techniques for reinforced concrete (RC) members. DFOS is more effective at detecting minor strains, while DIC excels in measuring large strains in RC structures. Both DFOS and DIC techniques facilitated the monitoring of crack development in RC structures, providing detailed analyses of the location, number, spacing, and width of the cracks. However, beyond the cracking load, the DFOS results can become unreliable due to the impact of cracks on the fiber optic readings. Therefore, DFOS and DIC measurement techniques can be used complementarily, taking into account their respective limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.