ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparison of Classifier Calibration Schemes for Movement Intention Detection in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy for Inducing Plasticity with Brain-Computer Interfaces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have successfully been used for stroke rehabilitation by pairing movement intentions with, e.g., functional electrical stimulation. It has also been proposed that BCI training is beneficial for people with cerebral palsy (CP). To develop BCI training for CP patients, movement intentions must be detected from single-trial EEG. The study aim was to detect movement intentions in CP patients and able-bodied participants using different classification scenarios to show the technical feasibility of BCI training in CP patients. Five CP patients and fifteen able-bodied participants performed wrist extensions and ankle dorsiflexions while EEG was recorded. All but one participant repeated the experiment on 1-2 additional days. The EEG was divided into movement intention and idle epochs that were classified with a random forest classifier using temporal, spectral, and template matching features to estimate movement intention detection performance. When calibrating the classifier on data from the same day and participant, 75% and 85% classification accuracies were obtained for CP- and able-bodied participants, respectively. The performance dropped by 5-15 percentage points when training the classifier on data from other days and other participants. In conclusion, movement intentions can be detected from single-trial EEG, indicating the technical feasibility of using BCIs for motor training in people with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.