ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Calib: A Scalable LiDAR-Camera Calibration Network for Variable Sensor Configurations.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional calibration methods rely on precise targets and frequent manual intervention, making them time-consuming and unsuitable for large-scale deployment. Existing learning-based approaches, while automating the process, are typically limited to single LiDAR-camera pairs, resulting in poor scalability and high computational overhead. To address these limitations, we propose a lightweight calibration network with flexibility in the number of sensor pairs, making it capable of jointly calibrating multiple cameras and LiDARs in a single forward pass. Our method employs a frozen pre-trained Swin Transformer as a shared backbone to extract unified features from both RGB images and corresponding depth maps. Additionally, we introduce a cross-modal channel-wise attention module to enhance key feature alignment and suppress irrelevant noise. Moreover, to handle variations in viewpoint, we design a modular calibration head that independently estimates the extrinsics for each LiDAR-camera pair. Through large-scale experiments on the nuScenes dataset, we show that our model, requiring merely 78.79 M parameters, attains a mean translation error of 2.651 cm and a rotation error of 0.246∘, achieving comparable performance to existing methods while significantly reducing the computational cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.