ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Explainable Framework for Mental Health Monitoring Using Lightweight and Privacy-Preserving Federated Facial Emotion Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuous analysis of emotional cues through facial emotion recognition (FER) systems can support mental health evaluation and psychological well-being monitoring systems. Most FER systems face privacy and trust concerns due to their centralized data approaches and lack of transparency, making potential deployment difficult. To address these concerns, a federated, explainability-driven FER framework designed to provide trustworthy and privacy-preserving emotion recognition with potential applications in mental health monitoring is proposed in this paper. The proposed lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) enables real-time inference while preserving high accuracy. Comprehensive evaluations on RAF-DB, ExpW, and FER2013 datasets, show that the proposed model demonstrates improved cross-dataset generalization compared to related works, achieving average accuracies of 75.5% and 74.3% in centralized and federated settings, respectively. Quantitative perturbation-based metrics, including Insertion and Deletion Area Under Curve (IAUC and DAUC), Average Drop (AD), Increase in Confidence (IC), Average Drop in Accuracy (ADA), and Active Pixel Ratio, were employed to objectively evaluate the quality and reliability of the model Grad-CAM++ explanations. The results confirm that model explainability enhances transparency and is directly associated with improved model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.