ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advanced Signal Processing Methods for Partial Discharge Analysis: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph-Based Framework with Waveform-Informed Connectivity for Multi-Label Partial Discharge Source-Type Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acoustic Signal Recognition of Partial Discharge Optical Fiber Sensors Using Time-Frequency Phase Composition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Dielectric Endurance of Nano-Additive Reinforced Polyester Composites via Hankel-RPCA Decomposition.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper comprehensively reviews advanced signal processing methods for partial discharge (PD) analysis, covering traditional time-frequency techniques, wavelet transform, Hilbert-Huang transform, and artificial intelligence-based methods. This paper critically examines the principles, advantages, limitations, and applicable scenarios of each method. A key contribution of this review is the systematic comparison of these methods, highlighting their evolution and complementary roles in processing non-stationary and noisy PD signals. However, a significant gap in current research remains the lack of standardized, explainable, and embeddable AI solutions for real-time, fine-grained PD classification. Future trends point to hybrid approaches and edge AI systems that combine physical insights with lightweight deep learning models to improve diagnostic accuracy and deployability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.