ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Synthetic Data Generation for AI-Based Quality Inspection of Laser Welds in Lithium-Ion Batteries.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manufacturing companies are increasingly confronted with critical challenges such as a shortage of skilled labor, rising production costs, and ever-stricter quality requirements. These challenges become particularly acute when defect types exhibit high visual variance, making consistent and accurate inspection difficult. Traditionally, visual inspection of high variance errors is performed manually by human operators-a process that is both costly and prone to errors. Consequently, there is a growing interest in replacing human inspection with AI-based visual quality control systems. However, the adoption of such systems is often hindered by limited access to training data, labor-intensive labeling processes, or the absence of real production data during early development stages. To address these challenges, this paper presents a methodology for training AI models using synthetically generated image data. The synthetic images are created using Physically Based Rendering, which enables precise control over rendering parameters and facilitates automated labeling. This approach allows for a systematic analysis of parameter importance and bypasses the need for large real training datasets. As a case study, the focus is on the inspection of laser welds in battery connectors for fully electric vehicles-a particularly demanding application due to the criticality of each weld. The results demonstrates the effectiveness of synthetic data in training robust AI models, thereby providing a scalable and efficient alternative to traditional data acquisition and labeling methods. The trained binary classifier reaches a precision of 0.94 with a recall of 0.98 solely trained on synthetic data and tested on real image data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.