ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clustered Federated Spatio-Temporal Graph Attention Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) for skeleton-based action recognition remains underexplored, particularly under strong client heterogeneity where regular FedAvg tends to cause client drift and unstable convergence. We introduce Clustered Federated Spatio-Temporal Graph Attention Networks (CF-STGAT), a clustered FL framework that leverages attention-derived spatio-temporal statistics from local STGAT models to dynamically group clients and perform attention-weighted inter-cluster fusion that gently align cluster models. Concretely, the server periodically extracts multi-head parameter-based attention descriptors, normalizes and projects them via PCA, and applies K-means to form clusters; a global reference is then computed by attention-similarity weighting and used to regularize each cluster model with a lightweight fusion step. On NTU RGB+D 60/120(NTU 60/120), CF-STGAT consistently outperforms strong FL baselines with the STGAT backbone, yielding absolute top-1 gains of +0.84/+4.09 (NTU 60, X-Sub/X-Setup) and +7.98/+4.18 (NTU 120, X-Sub/X-Setup) over FedAvg, alongside smoother per-client trajectories and lower terminal test loss. Ablations indicate that attention-guided clustering and inter-cluster fusion are complementary: clustering reduces within-group variance whereas fusion limits cross-cluster divergence. The approach keeps local training unchanged and adds only server-side statistics and clustering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.