ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Event-Based Camera Modeling for Atmospheric Turbulence Prediction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atmospheric turbulence degrades long-range imaging and free-space optical performance, yet conventional measurement systems such as large-aperture scintillometers require active transmitters, precise alignment, and dedicated deployment. This study investigates whether a passive neuromorphic event camera can provide reliable estimates of the refractive-index structure parameter Cn2 along a 300 m horizontal path. We conducted a week-long field experiment using a Prophesee EVK-4 HD event camera (Prophesee, Paris, France), a Basler acA2040-120um HD CMOS video camera (Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany), and a Scintec BLS900 scintillometer (Scintec AG, Rottenburg, Germany) as ground truth. A compact set of 19 statistical event-stream features was extracted over multiple integration times (2-50 s), and machine learning regression models were trained to predict the corresponding scintillometer-measured turbulence. Across the full turbulence range 10-14-10-12 m-2/3, the best-performing model (XGBoost) achieved a Pearson correlation of 0.93 and a mean absolute relative error of 35%, with longer integration times and higher-contrast regions yielding improved accuracy. The results also quantify, for the first time in field conditions, how integration time, target contrast, and feature stability influence event-based turbulence estimation. These findings demonstrate that passive event-driven sensing can approximate scintillometer-level turbulence measurements without active illumination, enabling compact, low-power alternatives for real-time atmospheric monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.